But parts of it are charming
Carrying on from the other day, I have spent more time surfing the web aimlessly in the past week than ... well, ever, because the last time I had this much time on my hands it was 1995 and what passed for the web was small and rather dull and filled with PhD synopses, geek jokes and porn.
One can only read so many PhDs. Porn somehow never made it into my world, and geek jokes sail straight over my head. While there are a bunch of programs that I can drive like Fangio; I have No Idea how any of it works. It's the reverse of old-fashioned cars, where I understand the theory of a starter motor quite well and can change a tyre, but can't drive.
The web has always been a tool for me, in the same way that a good dictionary is, but never a
place to hang out casually. So I must apologise profusely to she-knows-who for being startled by her H/D piece, because not only was it well-written (in and of itself. Compared to the other fanfic I've met in the last two days, she's bloody Dylan Thomas), but she does nice things with her speculative pairings that the characters would enjoy, rather than the nasty stuff that's out there. Oh so many simmering Alan Rickman fixations in the world, who'd have thought it?
About 20 years ago (maybe a bit more) I read a short story that may well have been by Anne Maccaffrey (I seem to recall it being in a more fantasy-oriented collection than the other speculative fiction writers I delved into). It was about a girl who was at 'psychic school' and one of their assignments was to go through reams of computer tape from the systems that ran every home in their world and listen to it all before archiving.
Her fellow students were all bored solid and mocked many of the people who had committed various things to tape 40 years before. At the climax of the story, she stood before her classmates and bawled them out over their attitude. Having the tapes remind them of their loved one's birthdays was purely sensible, she argued. That woman who had her tape tell her to eat better and exercise more, well, it must have worked, because three months later she cancelled the instruction. The woman who kept her husband's voice on the tape in the years after he died, the man who had his wife tape the recipes for his favourite meals so that he could cook them when she went away ... all these things weren't foolish, they were human. What was on the tapes was about reaching out and connecting, and sometimes humans had to use a computer to do that.
Her diatribe was overheard by her professor and she was awarded full marks. And whoever the writer was, she was right. Aside from all the porn and all the international newspapers and museums, there's this huge part of the web that is people saying "I'm alive, it's important, is anyone listening?" And that's not sad, that's human. Terry Pratchett, who is probably my favourite satirist (sorry Pope and Rochester) has a piece in one of his books where he talks about how much language is "I'm alive, you're alive". People connecting so that they know they're not alone. God, I've come over all Howard's End …
The point of all this, is that it's startling and humbling to see the rawness that people reveal on the web. And hard. One lj I read this afternoon is by a friend of mine who I really like but am not hugely close to simply because we've never had the time to forge a close relationship and live too far apart for it to happen casually. She's an amazing woman; physically striking and appealling, with a big brain and a wide open view of the world. And yet she feels crushed by things at the moment, because she's lonely and there are stupid men in the world.
I posted a comment that was meant to be reassuring, and I'm working slowly on an email to her, but, of course, what she needs is to have more people there. Because if I was there, I'd take her out on a big walk through her city. We'd go rowing and try and catch ducks. We'd perve on the hot senior boys at the best school and run away feeling like Germaine Greer. We'd sit in bars and bemoan the fact that hot schoolboys turn into potatoey men. In person, I'm useful. Online, I'm not.
And yet. Reading through the posts of other friends of hers who had written back to her, you could see that they love her. Fingers crossed, she could see that they loved her. And it's a good thing to be able to turn to the world and say "I need to know I'm loved" and to have a response.
It's especially good when it's a reasonable response. One of the other blogs I looked at was an old friend from uni who is writing these days. He's not a bad writer, but he's stilted and you can see that a lot of his work is about machinating characters towards a point where he can get in his Big Dramatic Scene. While I completely accept that sometimes you just need to do this, you should never be able to see where it's done. He put some stories up and asked for criticism. Most of his friends wrote "Yeah, great!" One, who I think I probably know, wrote "Well, these bits are problematic." She was completely right, too. But his other friends turned on her for being critical and unsupportive and went back to telling him that he was a genius. He's not. And if he listened to her, he would be a better writer.
So my first friend needs to believe things about her that are true; that she's amazing and that she's someone who other people are grateful to have in their lives. My second friend (well, ex-friend, really, I haven't seen him in 12 years) needs to sort the truth from the tosh. And I'll never know if he can. Unless the next story he posts is markedly improved …
The other thing that I've noticed about blogs and ljs is that people use them to live parts of their lives that they keep quiet in the real world. So one of the knitting girls has a whole section of S&M, whereas I have met her and in the real world she is more twin-set and pearls. Now this part I completely get, because that's what we all do in the SCA. Perfectly reasonable post-modern cyberchicks like Autumnheart become twirling figures of Romantic fantasy. A world-weary cynic like Mr C becomes a character of epic proportions, with his own Mount Doom. A sweet, gentle guy like Sir Phil becomes -- actually, he stays a sweet, gentle guy. Southron Gaard's kk is an arse-kickingly focussed wordsmith in the real world, and a witty troubadour filled with glee in the SCA.
Even Miss D and the Duchess aren't the same. And not just because I try not to tell people to go fuck themselves while wearing a frock. The Duchess cares more about people. She remembers that it's important to say hello and goodbye to everyone, while D is just focussed on getting to the airport. I think she has more of the nice bits of me.
Early on in my time in the SCA, someone described it as a place where we can all be better versions of ourselves. Now I'm not wholly sure that this definition stands up to scrutiny. Some people are much worse. But it is a place where we can try out ideas about ourselves and see how they fit. For example, it's the only place in my life these days where I get to hang out with a lot of kids and be mad Aunty D. I enjoy that a lot. I have a feeling that the SCA has been for me what lj and blogs are for others.
This is what I looked like when I joined, in fact, this is me at my first Festival. I had a hoot. The King of the West pursued me (hey, he was going home in a week; guaranteed amusement with no entanglements!), various Chiv bought all my drinks, but at the same time they all explained to me their version of how things worked. There were classes on things that I realised I could actually do. People who I had been told were scary were in fact interesting and about my age (28).
I kept meeting people who I would never have talked to anywhere else, and wanting to keep talking to them. (And yes, the KoW ended up being a good and valued friend.) I didn't really sleep the whole weekend (note the Monday bags under the eyes.) But how much of that was because the SCA is a good place for people, and how much of that was because I was a fit and slight girl with long hair and round breasts?
I did have something of a chance to test that out over the next few months, because I'd been back from Festival for 10 days when I rode home from a gig in town and was wiped out by a taxi hitting me full side-on.
So this is what I looked like four weeks later. This is the comparatively nice shot after the swelling and bruising started to fade, because the other photos are just hidjous.
And the SCA was there for me again. People who had only known me for a few months brought me groceries. Mouse loaned me shirts that I could fit my cast into, and drove me about. She also engineered the Great May Coronet Face Scare incident, but the less said about that, the better. Muirghein and Elfinn fussed over me like mother ducks and a swathe of Ursies were fabulous and helped me with day-to-day things like housework. The SCA was a huge part of the network of people I cared for who helped me through those months.
And despite having concussion and forgetting most of 1994 and the first half of 1995, I remember all those kindnesses. I remember all the people who went out of their way to say "You're alive, and we're happy about that."
And what I've realised, is that you don't need a near-death accident to want to know that your friends and acquaintances are happy that you're alive. And that even if it's inept, gestures do help and do make a difference. So I'd better go and write that email now.
One can only read so many PhDs. Porn somehow never made it into my world, and geek jokes sail straight over my head. While there are a bunch of programs that I can drive like Fangio; I have No Idea how any of it works. It's the reverse of old-fashioned cars, where I understand the theory of a starter motor quite well and can change a tyre, but can't drive.
The web has always been a tool for me, in the same way that a good dictionary is, but never a
place to hang out casually. So I must apologise profusely to she-knows-who for being startled by her H/D piece, because not only was it well-written (in and of itself. Compared to the other fanfic I've met in the last two days, she's bloody Dylan Thomas), but she does nice things with her speculative pairings that the characters would enjoy, rather than the nasty stuff that's out there. Oh so many simmering Alan Rickman fixations in the world, who'd have thought it?
About 20 years ago (maybe a bit more) I read a short story that may well have been by Anne Maccaffrey (I seem to recall it being in a more fantasy-oriented collection than the other speculative fiction writers I delved into). It was about a girl who was at 'psychic school' and one of their assignments was to go through reams of computer tape from the systems that ran every home in their world and listen to it all before archiving.
Her fellow students were all bored solid and mocked many of the people who had committed various things to tape 40 years before. At the climax of the story, she stood before her classmates and bawled them out over their attitude. Having the tapes remind them of their loved one's birthdays was purely sensible, she argued. That woman who had her tape tell her to eat better and exercise more, well, it must have worked, because three months later she cancelled the instruction. The woman who kept her husband's voice on the tape in the years after he died, the man who had his wife tape the recipes for his favourite meals so that he could cook them when she went away ... all these things weren't foolish, they were human. What was on the tapes was about reaching out and connecting, and sometimes humans had to use a computer to do that.
Her diatribe was overheard by her professor and she was awarded full marks. And whoever the writer was, she was right. Aside from all the porn and all the international newspapers and museums, there's this huge part of the web that is people saying "I'm alive, it's important, is anyone listening?" And that's not sad, that's human. Terry Pratchett, who is probably my favourite satirist (sorry Pope and Rochester) has a piece in one of his books where he talks about how much language is "I'm alive, you're alive". People connecting so that they know they're not alone. God, I've come over all Howard's End …
The point of all this, is that it's startling and humbling to see the rawness that people reveal on the web. And hard. One lj I read this afternoon is by a friend of mine who I really like but am not hugely close to simply because we've never had the time to forge a close relationship and live too far apart for it to happen casually. She's an amazing woman; physically striking and appealling, with a big brain and a wide open view of the world. And yet she feels crushed by things at the moment, because she's lonely and there are stupid men in the world.
I posted a comment that was meant to be reassuring, and I'm working slowly on an email to her, but, of course, what she needs is to have more people there. Because if I was there, I'd take her out on a big walk through her city. We'd go rowing and try and catch ducks. We'd perve on the hot senior boys at the best school and run away feeling like Germaine Greer. We'd sit in bars and bemoan the fact that hot schoolboys turn into potatoey men. In person, I'm useful. Online, I'm not.
And yet. Reading through the posts of other friends of hers who had written back to her, you could see that they love her. Fingers crossed, she could see that they loved her. And it's a good thing to be able to turn to the world and say "I need to know I'm loved" and to have a response.
It's especially good when it's a reasonable response. One of the other blogs I looked at was an old friend from uni who is writing these days. He's not a bad writer, but he's stilted and you can see that a lot of his work is about machinating characters towards a point where he can get in his Big Dramatic Scene. While I completely accept that sometimes you just need to do this, you should never be able to see where it's done. He put some stories up and asked for criticism. Most of his friends wrote "Yeah, great!" One, who I think I probably know, wrote "Well, these bits are problematic." She was completely right, too. But his other friends turned on her for being critical and unsupportive and went back to telling him that he was a genius. He's not. And if he listened to her, he would be a better writer.
So my first friend needs to believe things about her that are true; that she's amazing and that she's someone who other people are grateful to have in their lives. My second friend (well, ex-friend, really, I haven't seen him in 12 years) needs to sort the truth from the tosh. And I'll never know if he can. Unless the next story he posts is markedly improved …
The other thing that I've noticed about blogs and ljs is that people use them to live parts of their lives that they keep quiet in the real world. So one of the knitting girls has a whole section of S&M, whereas I have met her and in the real world she is more twin-set and pearls. Now this part I completely get, because that's what we all do in the SCA. Perfectly reasonable post-modern cyberchicks like Autumnheart become twirling figures of Romantic fantasy. A world-weary cynic like Mr C becomes a character of epic proportions, with his own Mount Doom. A sweet, gentle guy like Sir Phil becomes -- actually, he stays a sweet, gentle guy. Southron Gaard's kk is an arse-kickingly focussed wordsmith in the real world, and a witty troubadour filled with glee in the SCA.
Even Miss D and the Duchess aren't the same. And not just because I try not to tell people to go fuck themselves while wearing a frock. The Duchess cares more about people. She remembers that it's important to say hello and goodbye to everyone, while D is just focussed on getting to the airport. I think she has more of the nice bits of me.
Early on in my time in the SCA, someone described it as a place where we can all be better versions of ourselves. Now I'm not wholly sure that this definition stands up to scrutiny. Some people are much worse. But it is a place where we can try out ideas about ourselves and see how they fit. For example, it's the only place in my life these days where I get to hang out with a lot of kids and be mad Aunty D. I enjoy that a lot. I have a feeling that the SCA has been for me what lj and blogs are for others.
This is what I looked like when I joined, in fact, this is me at my first Festival. I had a hoot. The King of the West pursued me (hey, he was going home in a week; guaranteed amusement with no entanglements!), various Chiv bought all my drinks, but at the same time they all explained to me their version of how things worked. There were classes on things that I realised I could actually do. People who I had been told were scary were in fact interesting and about my age (28).
I kept meeting people who I would never have talked to anywhere else, and wanting to keep talking to them. (And yes, the KoW ended up being a good and valued friend.) I didn't really sleep the whole weekend (note the Monday bags under the eyes.) But how much of that was because the SCA is a good place for people, and how much of that was because I was a fit and slight girl with long hair and round breasts?
I did have something of a chance to test that out over the next few months, because I'd been back from Festival for 10 days when I rode home from a gig in town and was wiped out by a taxi hitting me full side-on.
So this is what I looked like four weeks later. This is the comparatively nice shot after the swelling and bruising started to fade, because the other photos are just hidjous.
And the SCA was there for me again. People who had only known me for a few months brought me groceries. Mouse loaned me shirts that I could fit my cast into, and drove me about. She also engineered the Great May Coronet Face Scare incident, but the less said about that, the better. Muirghein and Elfinn fussed over me like mother ducks and a swathe of Ursies were fabulous and helped me with day-to-day things like housework. The SCA was a huge part of the network of people I cared for who helped me through those months.
And despite having concussion and forgetting most of 1994 and the first half of 1995, I remember all those kindnesses. I remember all the people who went out of their way to say "You're alive, and we're happy about that."
And what I've realised, is that you don't need a near-death accident to want to know that your friends and acquaintances are happy that you're alive. And that even if it's inept, gestures do help and do make a difference. So I'd better go and write that email now.
16 Comments:
You really are a brilliant writer you know. Thank you for making me stop and think this morning. And for giving me a break from my morning work :)
I also have to say that the one thing I dislike about blogs/ljs is the blindly supportive culture they promote. There is such a thing as constructive criticism,a nd while there are times to just be there for a person, there are also times to point out things, like in the writing example you gave.
That is my 3cents worth for today. (hey, canadian money is worth more!)
(In the fine tradition of work avoidance, "Hi" from Blayney)
I was going to write something about the;
"But his other friends turned on her for being critical and unsupportive and went back to telling him that he was a genius. He's not."
But K beat me to it, so "What she said". (No wonder I hired her).
Friends help you move.
Good friends help you move bodies.
Friends bail you out of gaol.
Good friends are sitting beside you going "gee, that was fun".
Friends say "There, there, it will all be okay and you are a precious snowflake"
Good friends say "Actually, it is your fault and you need to face it. I'll make the tea."
Yay for tea!! Pretty much anything can be faced with a cup of it (I can't stand the stuff and still appreciate its restorative qualities.) I'm not brilliant, Deense, I'm lazy, or there'd be fabbo novels instead of a blog. Now, back to a mag story on bonsai ...
Even with the blackworked shirt, the post accident shot still looks kinda like a mug shot.
The colour of your eyeballs was impressive I recall.
That first festival photo is inspiring. So while we're being constructive, let's get you into some hard-core training so a) you can fit back into your old garb, thus expanding your wardrobe choices and making other Laurels jealous and b) if you can't fit back into your old garb, at least you can have the joy of beating people over the head with a stick (including your apprentice).
Mr B got your helm to come up nice and shiny so all you need is the rest of the kit and we can play biffo.
The bloody eye of DOOOOM!!! I particularly liked the way the eyelid bruising faded so that it was burgandy over the eyeballs and yellow in the arch beneath my eyebrows on each eye. I was so grateful to the cast so that no-one thought it was just bad goth eye make-up. How are you, Ms Mouse? When are we going to get together for dessert?
Ant, my dear, my old garb is TERRIBLY MADE. But yes, there has been much walking and lifting of weights and swinging of sticks, all with the express purpose of being able to get a big Italian frock out of 4.5m of fabric rather than 6m. Because that's important.
Of course it's important, it also means 25% less washing, ironing, running of fan heater and DVD while hand sewing said large italian frock. Weight loss is downright environmental!
When being a good friend you can also make nice warm cups of;
*Get the F over it
*Toughen/Grow the F up
Hi Blaney!
I like your friends list. It's true - friends are the ones that are there to hold your hand. When it's so comfortable you barely realise you're doing it. You still love you when they're cleaning upi your vomit, or watching you cry.
Hard to do that via the 'net.
And D, despite your 'importance of literature' comments, and my screwed up brains at this point, I still can't fugging stand Keats. We're going to print out a life-size pic of the pansy and shoot arrows at it on the last day of term.
I will defend Keats's abilities to the death, but I also think that it is perfectly reasonable to loathe and despise him, especially if you have to teach him at high school level. He is more fun if you look at him through a history of literature prism because he then connects to a lot of loonies who are all about sex and drugs and would have liked rock 'n' roll if only it had been invented by then. I only go to the mat over people liking Richard Burton reading Under Milk Wood, because if that doesn't get to you in a good way, there's something seriously wrong.
this is the double edged sword of public blogging. You can get great support but then it can go too far and you can become reliant on it or find that people give support without really understanding what *you* really need in they way of support. I see it a lot in friends locked posts when someone expresses disappointment/annoyance.
And Miss D. as far as hideousness after the accident (never mind the "ow, that looks painful" reaction) you rate maybe a Gerry Butler on the Phantom Scale.
Damn it Miss Myna, now I'm going to have to watch an ALW musical, and I have spent a lifetime avoiding that. To you he's all great production values and fabulous frocks, but to me he's forever to blame for sodding Sarah Brightman, who was much better suited to the Kenny Everett Video Show. I'll show you the fresh-out-of hospital shots one day for the complete Lon Chaney look (no music, but the scariest bloody film I ever saw. Watched it when I was five, had nightmares till I was about 32.)
And yes, you are right about needing judgement. I'm eternally grateful that my friends are mostly of the Blayney-approved variety, and that they've slapped me upside the back of the head enough to know that sometimes what you need to hear is "Well, it's crap," whether that be crap with potential or a sign to move on to the next attempt. And you should give Baggy her spotty frock link before we all explode with curiosity.
If you watch the movie, do be prepared for a terrific laugh and cry fest. It reminded me of covers of several historical romance novels. Maybe some Mills and Boon covers thrown in....
Phantom is more about the potential it could be for me. I've only seen one show I could say "wow, that comes close to what was in my head" and that was in all the way over in Denmark. And was almost totally down to the lead actress being totally mesmerising.
Yes, I have seen the 1925 version bloody marvelous stuff. As for scarey, I don't think you can top the 1980s one with Robert "freddie Kruger" Englund for sheer gore factor. Terror, probably as gore fests tend not to be terrifying;)
I personally think any ALW show written without tim Rice is utter pap. But then, that's just me, and I'm a massive JCS fan
Your Alive and I am happy about that! :P
Your friendship and support have been, a important factor in my life for several years.
Your introduction of a broader range of literature to me was imperative to my development.
And your compliments of me to others, always makes me beem and feel loved.
Thankyou Thankyou Thankyou.
Much hugs.
You're very welcome, Mr Phil. And I'm very gald to hear that you paid attention to the required reading list ;-)
Post a Comment
<< Home